Records show that Charles Skull (1780–1851) was a
chair japanner in
High Wycombe. He had several children but it was his sons, Edwin
(1810–1873)
and Walter (1816–1893),
who were to become the best known within the funiture industry of the
town.
Long before the advent of railways the two brothers were sending chairs
by road to London and had a furniture depot in Liverpool, managed by
Walter.
It was in Liverpool that Walter met his wife, Ellen Foster, whom he
married
in 1850. In 1872 he purchased a chair factory in
High Wycombe
from a Mr John Tilbury, and with his son, Charles Edwin Skull
(1850–1931), developed the Skull chair-making business which
had already achieved
an
excellent reputation for its "Wycombe" chairs.
Walter retired from active chair making in 1884 and
on his
death, bestowed
a thriving business upon his son Charles Edwin. Charles Edwin
married
Georgiana (pronounced Georjana) Tilbury, quite probably a relation of
John
Tilbury (but not his daughter), and set up home in High Wycombe at a
house
called Edgerley or Eversley. He was keen to raise the whole
standard of
chair
design and to make Wycombe famous for a range of fine chairs,
far
better than the rush-seated and Windsor models that it was already
known
for. He sought inspiration from authentic antiques and soon
established
a market for reproduction furntiure of quality and craftmanship. As his
prosperity increased he moved to a magnificent house on Amersham Hill,
confusingly called Enderley, where he raised his family of six sons and
four daughters.
Almost from the start he was to find that it was his
sons who
were going
to bring him the greatest joy, the deepest sorrow and the worse
problems.
In 1880 his fourth son died at only ten months old. He had
been called
Charles Arthur and, rather surprisingly, when Georgiana gave birth to
their
fifth son the following year, they gave him the same name. Then in
February
1886 his sixth son, Arthur, was to die when he was just thirteen months
old. The grief of the family must have been unimaginable when
in
August that same year his eldest son, Walter, was tragically drowned in
the mill pond on the Rye. He was thirteen years old.
The remaining children grew to adulthood and, fitting their status in life, were to marry well. Fred, the eldest son, joined his father in the business in 1886 with Percy and Charles Arthur being admitted into the partnership not long after. They expanded the firm's output to include cabinet making, developing designs from wax impressions taken from antiques housed in museums and the collections of wealthy connoisseurs. All Charles Edwin's children were given shares in their father's business and enjoyed the company's prosperity.
Finding genuine antiques on which to base their designs became a passion for Fred and he eventually decided to break free from the company and set up on his own as an antiques dealer. This must have been a huge disappointment to his father but it appears that he retained links with the company and maintained an antiques collection on behalf of the Skull factory to eliminate all risk of them "reproducing the reproduction". Since Fred needed to raise funds in order to 'go it alone' he sold his shares to his youngest brother, Charles Arthur. This left Charles Edwin, now getting on in years, and his two younger sons to run the company. Photographs of the workshops taken at about this time show a large workforce making quality chairs and furniture which still required a great deal of manual labour in their production.
Percy and Charles Arthur did not always see eye to
eye about
the future
of the business but while their father was alive he was able
to quell
any arguments. Unfortunately, when Charles Edwin died in 1931
the
bickering between the two brothers began with a vengeance.
Percy
felt that they should be moving into the area of cheap mass produced
furniture
whereas Charles Arthur favoured the quality and traditional production
runs that the factory was famous for. Unfortunately Charles Arthur's
traditionalism
meant that he failed to see the enormous potential of producing
furniture
that was affordable to all. Having bought Fred's shares in
the business
he now had the greater power in company decisions and his intransigence
meant that the firm lost the opportunity to beat the competition by
producing
low cost, no frills furniture. Thus Percy had to sit and
watch Furniture
Industries Ltd, a rival firm, become the market leader in mass produced
furniture.
It was not that Charles Arthur didn't care about the well being of the family firm it was, if anything, because he cared too much. The firm's reputation for quality had been built up over many years and it was this reputation that would be put at risk if Percy's plan went ahead.
Ruth Nicholson Skull, now 85 and daughter of Charles Arthur, recalls "I remember my father walking to the factory every morning with Stumpy Wag, our little dog, at his side. Stumpy Wag must have thought of my father's office as his second home for he had his own basket in the corner. Our house at No 3, Lucas Road was bought and furnished with the results of my father's endeavour."
As predicted by Percy market trends changed and the trade in expensive, quality items slumped - the firm had to close. Had Charles Arthur been prepared to declare the business bankrupt his financial downfall and that of his brother Percy may not have been so great but despite his many faults he had strong family values. Bankruptcy would not only have brought enormous shame to the family but his four sisters would have lost the value of their shares. He did the only honourable thing and sold the business in 1934 - to Furniture Industries Ltd - to pay the company debts. Since he owned double the number of shares to that of his brother, Percy, his was by far the greater financial loss and he eventually sold the house in Lucas Road and moved into rented rooms. Even so Percy was understandably bitter and the rift between the two brothers grew to a chasm.
As a consequence Charles Arthur and Percy forbade
their
children to
meet or to have anything to do with one another. Both the
men's wives,
always good friends, thought the situation ludicrous and continued to
meet
weekly, somewhat clandestinely, in Lyons Coffee House to share family
news
and, by this time, to relay family hardships.
Thus the Skull children lost touch with their cousins, the only link remaining between them being the two mothers. Charles Arthur's children, in particular, suddenly found themselves bereft of all the niceties of life. Fortunately for Percy his children, Joan and Anne, were virtually grown up and both married well (Joan marrying Roland Clarke of Castle Hill). Charles Arthur, however, had two sons and two daughters with the youngest daughter, Ruth, still at boarding school. His eldest son, Charles Nicholson, was already training in his father's company and thus lost his job, Ruth lost the chance of going to college. All four children had to part with their savings from an inheritance from their grandfather, Charles Edwin, in order to pay their father's debts. As a result the Skull family became divided into 'the haves' and 'the have nots'.
Charles Arthur continued to work within the industry, gaining employment as a sales rep for other Wycombe manufacturers and Percy retired early and lived at Castle Hill with his daughter Joan. Fred, however, appeared to retain his earlier links with the Skull factory and was employed as a design historian for Walter Skull and Son (1932) Ltd, which became an off shoot of Furniture Industries Ltd. It would appear that this part of the company continued to make traditional furniture for the upper end of the market and traded under the Skull name due to its reputation for quality and craftsmanship. Furniture Industries Ltd later became better known as Ercol.
Lucian R Ercolani, owner of Furniture Industries Ltd, was to write in his memoirs that the Skull reputation for quality had really become a myth by the time his firm took over the Skull factory in the 1930s. He was astounded by the poor materials being used in the production process which were being touted as better than those of their competitors. He was equally horrified to see the disorganised way the different departments were managed. No doubt this lack of controlled management stemmed from the constant bickering between Percy and Charles Arthur with poor materials being the initial cause of the friction between the two brothers - Percy being keen to prove that he could be more economical in the production costs of the company.
The animosity between the two men continued into old age. When Fred, the eldest brother, died in 1952 and his house, Bassetsbury Manor, was put up for sale Percy refused to agree that it could be sold to Charles Arthur's youngest son, Arthur Nicholson Skull. Instead, it was sold for far less to Wycombe Borough Council.
Fortunately, when Percy and Charles Arthur died the feud died with them, allowing Charles Edwin's grandchildren to remain in contact with one another. The skeleton in the cupboard is rarely talked of by the family today. The past is the past but every so often the bones give the odd, occasional rattle - if you listen carefully!
Sally Scagell, October 2000, updated Sept 2003
Footnote:
The above information has been collected from notes written
by Charles
Edwin Skull and Fred Skull, the memories of Ruth Nicholson Skull and
Arthur
Nicholson Skull and from details kept in the archives of Wycombe
Museum.
(Skull chairs can be seen in the furniture collection on show at the
museum).
For many years Ercol's kept the sign 'Walter Skull and Sons' at the
entrance
to their factory, just off the London Road, in High
Wycombe.
Many of the Skulls married into local Wycombe families and Arthur Skull
recalled "You couldn't walk down Wycombe High Street in the early days
without bumping into some relative or other."
This branch of the Skulls twice married into the
Peace family
(of Castle
Hill) and another branch twice married into the North family (Wycombe
furniture
manufacturers). Both Peace and Skull families were also linked to the
Treacher
family.